

The Doctrine organizes wartime cyber defense into seven structural pillars.

The Doctrine proposes five strategic principals for coordinated wartime cyber defense:
Erin Owens - Cyber Defense Center


The doctrine is grounded in five principles: civilian infrastructure is a strategic asset, the private sector is the front line of defense, delegated authority expands national capacity, wartime cyber defense requires different rules, and civil cyber defense requires coordination.

The doctrine organizes wartime cyber defense into seven structural pillars: Delegated Civilian Cyber Defense Authority, Wartime Safe Harbor and Reporting, Integrated Intelligence and Threat Sharing, Critical Infrastructure Readiness and Containment, National Civil Cyber Defense Mobilization, Economic Counter Coercion, and Wartime Investigation and Digital Forensics Infrastructure.

37 Total Doctrine Mechanisms enabling coordinated civilian cyber defense during conflict.
The Jefferson Cyber Defense Doctrine activates at Cyber Defense Force Posture Level 4 and Level 5, when nation state cyber conflict transitions from threat conditions into active wartime operations.

26 Wartime Policies defining national cyber defense structure.
The doctrine organizes wartime cyber defense into seven structural pillars: Delegated Civilian Cyber Defense Authority, Wartime Safe Harbor and Reporting, Integrated Intelligence and Threat Sharing, Critical Infrastructure Readiness and Containment, National Civil Cyber Defen
26 Wartime Policies defining national cyber defense structure.
The doctrine organizes wartime cyber defense into seven structural pillars: Delegated Civilian Cyber Defense Authority, Wartime Safe Harbor and Reporting, Integrated Intelligence and Threat Sharing, Critical Infrastructure Readiness and Containment, National Civil Cyber Defense Mobilization, Economic Counter Coercion, and Wartime Investigation and Digital Forensics Infrastructure.

11 Wartime Authorities governing delegated execution and oversight. Wartime authorities define both the operational capabilities delegated to civilian cyber defenders and the governance mechanisms exercised by state and federal entities to ensure controlled and lawful execution. Civilian cyber defenders operate under delegated authority
11 Wartime Authorities governing delegated execution and oversight. Wartime authorities define both the operational capabilities delegated to civilian cyber defenders and the governance mechanisms exercised by state and federal entities to ensure controlled and lawful execution. Civilian cyber defenders operate under delegated authority and are subject to coordinated state and federal governance to ensure controlled, lawful, and proportional execution.

The United States recognizes that national defense may extend beyond standing military forces through the lawful participation of its citizens. Article I, Section 8 grants Congress authority to call forth the militia, while early practice, including Letters of Marque and actions under President Jefferson during the Barbary Wars, demonstra
The United States recognizes that national defense may extend beyond standing military forces through the lawful participation of its citizens. Article I, Section 8 grants Congress authority to call forth the militia, while early practice, including Letters of Marque and actions under President Jefferson during the Barbary Wars, demonstrates the use of delegated civilian capability under legal authority. Together with the Federalist Papers, this establishes a consistent precedent for organized civilian participation in national defense.
US Constitution Article I, Section 8, Clause 15
PILLAR I: Delegated Civilian Cyber Defense Authority
Link: POLICY
Authorizes qualified U.S. organizations to conduct limited defensive cyber countermeasures against foreign adversary infrastructure during wartime under federal oversight.
PILLAR II: Wartime Safe Harbor and Reporting
Link: POLICY
Suspends regulatory penalties for companies that experience cyber attacks during wartime when incidents are reported immediately to federal authorities.
PILLAR I: Delegated Civilian Cyber Defense Authority
Establishes a federal certification program allowing approved organizations to participate in authorized wartime cyber defense activities.
PILLAR I: Delegated Civilian Cyber Defense Authority
Allows authorized defenders to disable adversary controlled infrastructure being actively used in cyber attacks against U.S. organizations.
PILLAR V: National Civil Cyber Defense Mobilization
Creates a national program for deputizing private cybersecurity teams as part of a coordinated wartime cyber defense network.
PILLAR V: National Civil Cyber Defense Mobilization
Establishes a reimbursement mechanism for approved defensive expenditures using preapproved cybersecurity capabilities to support national cyber defense operations.
PILLAR II: Wartime Safe Harbor and Reporting
Requires rapid reporting of cyber incidents to federal authorities and sector ISACs during wartime conditions.
PILLAR II: Wartime Safe Harbor and Reporting
Protects cybersecurity professionals who disclose vulnerabilities or attacks affecting national infrastructure during wartime.
PILLAR III: Integrated Intelligence and Threat Sharing
Establishes a national early warning capability for detecting large scale cyber attack campaigns targeting critical infrastructure.
PILLAR III: Integrated Intelligence and Threat Sharing
Creates a national threat alert network distributing real time cyber intelligence to infrastructure operators.
PILLAR III: Integrated Intelligence and Threat Sharing
Establishes a CISA sponsored repository of indicators of compromise, YARA rules, and Sigma detections derived from attacks against U.S. infrastructure.
PILLAR V: National Civil Cyber Defense Mobilization
Establishes a central coordination hub for national cyber defense operations and cross sector collaboration.

Alexander Hamilton - Federalist No. 23
PILLAR VII: Wartime Investigation and Digital Forensics Infrastructure
Establishes a coordinated digital forensics response capability supporting infrastructure operators during cyber conflict.
PILLAR VII: Wartime Investigation and Digital Forensics Infrastructure
Creates a national laboratory dedicated to digital forensic investigation and evidence preservation during cyber conflict.
PILLAR VII: Wartime Investigation and Digital Forensics Infrastructure
Provides training, forensic tools, and multimedia analysis capabilities through national laboratories.
PILLAR IV: Critical Infrastructure Readiness and Containment
Requires vendors supporting critical infrastructure to disclose cybersecurity incidents and vulnerabilities.
PILLAR IV: Critical Infrastructure Readiness and Containment
Requires vendors providing operational technology platforms to provide standardized cybersecurity training for infrastructure operators.
PILLAR IV: Critical Infrastructure Readiness and Containment
Establishes emergency satellite communications capability to maintain national connectivity during cyber attacks on telecommunications networks.
PILLAR VI: Economic Counter Coercion
Allows tariffs or economic penalties against states harboring or supporting cyber attacks on U.S. infrastructure.
PILLAR VI: Economic Counter Coercion
Designates specific cyber threat groups as terrorist organizations to prohibit ransom payments and financial support.
PILLAR VI: Economic Counter Coercion
Prohibits ransom payments that could finance hostile nation states or their proxies.
PILLAR VI: Economic Counter Coercion
Increases criminal penalties for cyber attacks conducted during wartime conditions.
PILLAR III: Integrated Intelligence and Threat Sharing
Expands security clearance access for critical infrastructure cyber leaders to improve wartime intelligence coordination.
PILLAR III: Integrated Intelligence and Threat Sharing
Supports advanced cyber threat analysis, malware research, and defensive capability development through collaboration with national laboratories, separate from operational coordination functions.
James Madison - Federalist No. 41

PILLAR V: National Civil Cyber Defense Mobilization
Organizes civilian cyber defenders into a coordinated national defense network during wartime cyber conflict.
PILLAR V: National Civil Cyber Defense Mobilization
Establishes national wartime cyber defense exercises and training programs to prepare infrastructure operators and private defenders for coordinated conflict response.
US Constitution Article I, Section 8, Clause 16
Link: AUTHORITY
Delegated Civilian Operational Authority
Enables critical infrastructure to implement “Break the Glass” procedures during wartime for all MSP, vendor, and administrative support interactions.
Delegated Civilian Operational Authority
Requires defenders to confirm that observed activity aligns with known wartime objectives before taking destructive defensive action.
Delegated Civilian Operational Authority
Requires strict chain of custody procedures for digital evidence collected during wartime cyber incidents to ensure evidentiary integrity, coordination, and admissibility.
Delegated Civilian Operational Authority
Restricts authorized cyber defense actions to those directly tied to active hostile operations and prohibits retaliation, financial exploitation, or unnecessary collateral disruption.
Link: AUTHORITY
Delegated Civilian Operational Authority
Requires participating organizations to treat material cyber compromise, adversary presence, and exploitability as expected conditions during wartime cyber force posture activation.
Delegated Civilian Operational Authority
Authorizes infrastructure operators to rapidly isolate, segment, or disconnect compromised systems and networks during active cyber conflict conditions to contain adversary activity and preserve operational stability.
Governance Authority
Limits participation in delegated wartime cyber defense activities to organizations that maintain active federal certification under the Wartime Cyber Defense Authorization Certificate program.
Governance Authority
Reserves nation state attribution authority to federal agencies while allowing private sector defenders to identify threat groups, techniques, and adversary behaviors.
Governance Authority
Requires detailed operational logging, forensic evidence retention, and incident reporting to federal authorities for all delegated wartime cyber defense actions.
Governance Authority
Allows designated state and federal authorities to suspend or revoke certification, impose civil penalties, or pursue criminal liability for organizations that violate wartime cyber defense controls.
Link: AUTHORITY
Governance Authority
Establishes a wartime escalation construct that treats nationally significant cyber advisories as exceeding peacetime critical thresholds when active conflict conditions are present.
Thomas Jefferson’s 1813

The Constitution grants Congress authority to call forth the militia to execute laws, suppress insurrections, and repel invasions, establishing the legal foundation for mobilizing civilian capability in defense of the nation.
The Constitution reserves to the states the authority to govern and discipline militia forces, creating a dual-layer governance model balancing federal activation with state oversight.
Early American defense relied on both federal forces and private actors, demonstrating that national defense has historically extended beyond standing government institutions.
Congress authorized private citizens to act against foreign adversaries under legal authority, enabling offensive and defensive actions outside traditional military structures.
Private actors operating under Letters of Marque were subject to strict legal boundaries, ensuring actions remained aligned with national objectives and lawful conduct.
The use of private capabilities allowed the United States to scale defense capacity without permanently expanding federal military forces.
Jefferson employed a combination of naval force, delegated authority, and strategic action to counter persistent external threats to U.S. commerce and sovereignty.
President Thomas Jefferson’s message to Congress on December

The Barbary Wars demonstrated coordination between federal authority and nontraditional capabilities, reflecting a distributed defense model.
Jefferson’s correspondence emphasized that national security may require decisive action when faced with persistent threats, rather than passive defense.
The Federalist Papers assert that the powers required for national defense must be sufficient to address evolving and unpredictable threats.
Early governance models accepted that defense responsibilities could be distributed across federal, state, and civilian actors.
Taken together, constitutional authority, legislative action, and executive practice establish a clear precedent for lawful civilian participation in national defense under structured authority.
Please reach us at partner@cyberdefensecenter.org if you cannot find an answer to your question.
The Jefferson Cyber Defense Doctrine is a national framework for defending critical infrastructure during wartime cyber conflict by integrating civilian organizations into a coordinated defense posture through defined policies and delegated authorities.
The doctrine activates at Cyber Defense Force Posture Level 4 and Level 5, when cyber activity escalates from persistent threat conditions into active nation state conflict. SEE CURRENT ADVISORY LEVEL HERE
Most critical infrastructure is owned and operated by the private sector, making these organizations both the primary targets and the first line of defense during cyber conflict.
No. The doctrine authorizes limited, controlled defensive actions under federal oversight, with strict operational authorities governing what actions are permitted and prohibited.
The doctrine includes 11 wartime authorities that define execution boundaries, oversight requirements, attribution control, and enforcement mechanisms, ensuring actions remain lawful and aligned with national objectives.
Traditional frameworks focus on risk management and compliance. This doctrine establishes a wartime operational model, where cyber defense is treated as an active component of national security.
No. The Jefferson Cyber Defense Doctrine is a proposed policy framework and is not currently authorized by Congress, established through Executive Order, or implemented by a federal agency. It is intended to inform future policy development by outlining a structured approach to wartime cyber defense based on constitutional authority, historical precedent, and modern operational requirements.
Delegated authority allows qualified civilian organizations to perform specific defensive cyber actions under defined legal authorization, similar to historical practices such as Letters of Marque.
Organizations must meet certification requirements under the Wartime Cyber Defense Authorization Certificate (WCDAC) program and operate within defined governance and oversight structures.
States retain governance and oversight responsibilities, consistent with constitutional principles, while federal authorities coordinate national defense activation and strategic direction.
Nation state attribution authority is reserved to federal agencies, while private sector defenders may identify threat actors and techniques without escalating geopolitical risk.
During wartime conditions, organizations are required to treat cyber compromise and adversary presence as expected rather than unlikely, shifting from risk avoidance to active defense.
This authority establishes a wartime escalation model where critical cyber advisories are treated as exceeding peacetime severity thresholds during active conflict.
Through integrated intelligence sharing, early warning systems, and coordinated national response mechanisms, the doctrine enables faster detection, containment, and recovery.
The Wartime Safe Harbor Policy suspends regulatory penalties for organizations that promptly report cyber incidents during wartime conditions.
By increasing defensive capacity, enabling coordinated response, and introducing economic and legal countermeasures, the doctrine raises the cost and complexity of cyber attacks.
Yes. It draws from constitutional authority, the use of militia, Letters of Marque, and early American wartime practices under Thomas Jefferson.
No. The doctrine operates as an overlay during wartime conditions, augmenting existing cybersecurity frameworks rather than replacing them.
To establish a coordinated, lawful, and scalable national cyber defense capability that protects critical infrastructure and preserves national security during cyber conflict.
The Cyber Defense Center provides services aligned to the Jefferson Cyber Defense Doctrine to support wartime cyber readiness, operational resilience, and coordinated defense. These services include wartime preparation and readiness exercises, including CISA Tabletop Exercise Packages (CTEPs), advisory services for implementing doctrine-aligned policies and authorities, threat intelligence and adversary analysis, advanced research into emerging cyber threats, and incident response governance and consulting. The Center also supports organizations in integrating wartime defense principles, operational objectives, and coordinated response strategies into their existing cybersecurity programs.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.